Journal of Food Bioactives, ISSN 2637-8752 print, 2637-8779 online
Journal website www.isnff-jfb.com

Original Research

Volume 23, September 2023, pages 68-73


Quantitative analysis of phenylpropanoids in Rhodiola rosea from different producing areas

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Structures of three phenylpropanoid compounds.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Comparison of rosavin, rosarin and rosin, and total rosavins in R. rosea collected from two countries and five regions. (Hebei and Xinjiang are two provinces of China).

Tables

Table 1. Samples of Rhodiola rosea from different regions
 
Sample #OriginApproximate coordinatesAltitude (m)Description
S1Huocheng county, Xinjiang, China44.0531° N, 80.8717° E639Dryness by heating
S2Huocheng county, Xinjiang, China44.0531° N, 80.8717° E639Dryness by sun
S3Huocheng county, Xinjiang, China44.0531° N, 80.8717° E639Dryness by roasting
S4Huocheng county, Xinjiang, China44.0531° N, 80.8717° E639Purchased in September, 2019
S5Kazakhstan48.0196° N, 66.9237° E639Imported in September, 2019
S6Kazakhstan48.0196° N, 66.9237° E639Imported in June, 2019
S7Kazakhstan48.0196° N, 66.9237° E639Imported in October, 2019
S8Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province41.1586° N, 114.7201° E771Sun dry
S9Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province41.1586° N, 114.7201° E771Sun dry
S10Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province41.1586° N, 114.7201° E771Sun dry
S11Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province41.1586° N, 114.7201° E771Sun dry
S12Gongliu, Xinjiang Province43.4802° N, 82.2290° E788Sun dry, Collected in May, 2019
S13Gongliu, Xinjiang Province43.4802° N, 82.2290° E788Sun dry
S14Gongliu, Xinjiang Province43.4802° N, 82.2290° E788Sun dry
S15Gongliu, Xinjiang Province43.4802° N, 82.2290° E788Sun dry
S16Bazhou, Xinjiang Province31.8514° N, 106.7689° E392Sun dry
S17Bazhou, Xinjiang Province31.8514° N, 106.7689° E392Sun dry
S18Bazhou, Xinjiang Province31.8514° N, 106.7689° E392Sun dry

 

Table 2. Content (%) of three phenylpropanoids in Rhodiola samples from different regions
 
SourceSample NO.Total rosavinRosarinRosavinRosin
Huocheng, Xinjiang ProvinceS11.2540.2210.9620.071
S21.2410.2620.8760.104
S30.8980.180.6880.03
S40.9830.2050.6630.065
1.094 ± 0.1810.217 ± 0.0340.797 ± 0.1450.068 ± 0.030
KazakhstanS51.9340.4091.380.148
S61.2170.290.7120.219
S71.4130.2930.9620.159
1.521 ± 0.3710.331 ± 0.0681.018 ± 0.3380.175 ± 0.038
Zhangjiakou, Hebei ProvinceS80.8530.3060.4780.07
S91.1640.4290.5970.139
S101.0750.3820.5270.167
S111.20.3510.7390.111
1.073 ± 0.1560.367 ± 0.0520.585 ± 0.1140.122 ± 0.041
Gongliu, Xinjiang ProvinceS120.4120.0780.3030.032
S130.2540.0410.1770.037
S140.7490.1520.5070.091
S150.3810.0810.2320.069
0.449 ± 0.2110.088 ± 0.0460.305 ± 0.1440.057 ± 0.028
Bazhou, Xinjiang ProvinceS160.4350.0790.3160.04
S170.3020.0430.2180.042
S180.5020.0860.3660.051
0.413 ± 0.1020.069 ± 0.0230.300 ± 0.0750.044 ± 0.006

 

Table 3. Analysis of variation (ANOVA) for rosavin, rosin and rosin in R. rosea from different origins
 
PhenylpropanoidsSource of variationSum of SquaresDegree of freedomMean squareFSignificance
Total rosavinIntragroup variation2.95340.73815.9930
Intergroup variation0.6130.046
Total variation3.55317
RosarinIntragroup variation0.26140.06529.8130
Intergroup variation0.028130.002
Total variation0.28917
RosavinIntragroup variation1.29940.32510.4580.001
Intergroup variation0.404130.031
Total variation1.70217
RosinIntragroup variation0.03840.0119.4510.001
Intergroup variation0.013130.001
Total variation0.05217