Journal of Food Bioactives, ISSN 2637-8752 print, 2637-8779 online
Journal website www.isnff-jfb.com

Original Research

Volume 2, Number , June 2018, pages 98-103


5-Demethylnobiletin is more effective than nobiletin in preventing AOM/DSS-induced colorectal carcinogenesis in ICR mice

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Structures of (A) nobiletin and (B) 5-demethylnobiletin.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Experimental design of AOM/DSS-induced colorectal tumorigenesis in male ICR mice for 15 weeks.

Effects of NOB or DMNB prevented AOM/DSS-induced colorectal tumorigenesis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Morphology of colonic mucosal surface of AOM/DSS-treated mice.

(A) control group (B) AOM/DSS group (C) NOB and (D) DMNB group. Positive: AOM/DSS.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Inhibitoy effect of NOB and DMNB on AOM/DSS-induced IL-6 expression and distribution in colorectal tissue.

(A) Colonic tissues were embedded in paraffin and visualized by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis using IL-6 antibody demonstrated as dark stain. (B) Quantification of IL-6-labeling index (%) was determined by ImageJ (National Institute of Health). *p < 0.05, compared with control group. #p < 0.05, compared with AOM/DSS group.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.

The NOB and DMNB significantly prevented AOM/DSS-induced inflammatory responses in colonic mucosa tissue.

Total protein lysates from colonic mucosa detected the expression level of IL-6 (A) and COX-2 (B) by western blot. (C) Reverse transcriptional PCR analyzed colonic mucosa mRNA expression level of IL-6 and COX-2.

Tables

Table 1. Effects of NOB or DMNB on body weight and relative organ weight in AOM/DSS-induced CRC model
 
GroupsBody Weight (g)Relative organ weight (g)
LiverKidneySpleen
The data of body weight are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 12) and were statistically analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test. Different letters (a−b) represent significant differences among groups, p < 0.05. The data of relative organ weight performed by student’s t-tests, *p < 0.05, compared with control group.
Control50.7 ± 3.3a2.27 ± 0.160.85 ± 0.100.12 ± 0.04
AOM/DSS43.3 ± 3.3b2.25 ± 0.360.84 ± 0.090.23 ± 0.09*
AOM/DSS + 0.01% NOB46.8 ± 4.8c2.12 ± 0.310.85 ± 0.070.13 ± 0.03
AOM/DSS + 0.025% NOB48.8 ± 3.7ac2.16 ± 0.220.86 ± 0.100.15 ± 0.08
AOM/DSS + 0.01% DMNB47.6 ± 4.6ac2.09 ± 0.260.85 ± 0.130.13 ± 0.03
AOM/DSS + 0.025% DMNB48.2 ± 3.2ac2.10 ± 0.220.84 ± 0.090.13 ± 0.05

 

Table 2. Effects of NOB or DMNB on the colon length and number of tumors in AOM/DSS-induced CRC model
 
GroupsColon length (mm)NO. of Tumor/colon
SmallLargerTotal
The data of body weight are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 12) and were statistically analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test. Different letters (a−b) represent significant differences among groups, p < 0.05.
Control87.1 ± 5.7a1.1 ± 1.1a0.0 ± 0.0a1.1 ± 1.1a
AOM/DSS67.4 ± 6.0b10.4 ± 6.2b14.0 ± 10.4b24.4 ± 8.5b
AOM/DSS + 0.01% NOB78.3 ± 14.3bc7.8 ± 1.8ab2.4 ± 2.8a10.2 ± 3.8c
AOM/DSS + 0.025% NOB90.6 ± 14.4ac7.4 ± 2.1c1.4 ± 2.0a8.9 ± 2.5c
AOM/DSS + 0.01% DMNB81.2 ± 10.2ac6.9 ± 2.8c1.1 ± 1.4a8.0 ± 3.6c
AOM/DSS + 0.025% DMNB101.3 ± 11.4c6.6 ± 1.9c1.0 ± 2.0a7.6 ± 3.1c